Showing posts with label DC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DC. Show all posts

Monday, June 17, 2013

100 Words or Less: Stamp Day for Superman (1954 short film)

A Superman PSA to encourage kids to help out the government. That’s basically all this is. 

Defined either as a short film or an “extra episode” to the TV show, it’s about 18 minutes long and features Superman catching a robber who steals because he never learned how to save money. Meanwhile, Jimmy Olsen learned well as a child and buys a new fancy typewriter.

In the spirit of saving, don’t bother buying anything that includes this, just watch it for free on YouTube.


Noel Neill steals the spotlight, still my favorite Lois.


Sunday, June 16, 2013

Man of Steel: Full Review (spoilers)

Let me start off by saying that, as a Marvel fan, I liked this film better than Iron Man 3. And much more than The Dark Knight Rises. Story-wise, this film was great (which is what those other two lacked). But there were things I liked, and things I definitely did not.

First of all, somewhat sarcastically, this movie might has well have been named "Superman Begins," because it was essentially Batman Begins but for Clark Kent instead of Bruce Wayne.

That being said, as far as re-telling the origin story goes, this film does enough new ideas with Krypton that I forgive it for re-telling an origin story that everybody in the target audience already knows. It works.

OK, bad things first.

Shannon was annoying. His voice seemed to keep changing throughout the film, which was really confusing and annoying. But overall, the actor was just annoying. I get that they wanted to distinguish him from Terrance Stamp's portrayal, but still.

Amy Adams failed to impress me. Besides giving her a camera and following the Superman trail, she didn't really come off as a reporter. It wasn't essential to the story, or to her character.

Which leads me to, these characters were so one-dimensional. I didn't care about Lois. Or Perry White. Or Jimmy Olsen (oh, wait, that's because he wasn't in the movie). Jonathan Kent's morality and the dilemma he and Clark face is super simplified. Maybe they assumed enough people watched Smallville to know more about that. Faora was a killing machine, but we don't know why.

Zod is the worst. And he's the worst because the writers knew that he was one dimensional, they knew that he didn't have proper motivation, so they wrote in an excuse for that. "He's like that because he was programmed to be." That's not a great villain. That bothered me so much.

As minor as it may be, why was Superman's chest hair crawling out of his suit? Is that supposed to look good? Surely the costume designers could have made the suit fit tighter to the neck. Or something. Who made that call? Am I the only one bothered by this?

Also, the Kryptonian USB stick. As lame as it was, I went along with it, until the whole "it doesn't work! Why doesn't it work! Oh, it's because this needs to be slightly turned. Fixed!" So stupid.

I miss Jimmy Olsen.

Now on to the "large" complaints.

1. Felt too much like a remake of Superman II and not enough like a fresh new installment to reboot the franchise and kickstart the DC Cinematic Universe. The villains were essentially the same: Zod, right hand woman (not technically Faora in the 1970s, but super-duper similar), and mute muscle force that accompanies them. They get locked in the Phantom Zone at the beginning, get freed, and try to take over Earth. Then Superman stops them. Felt very similar.

2. Too much focus on aliens/first contact. I know that this was Snyder's intention, so some of you may disagree with me on this, but when I want to see Superman, I want a superhero movie, not an alien invasion movie. If I want that, then I'll watch an alien movie. Superman has become an icon of the Superhero genre, a symbol of comic fans everywhere, and this film was less a superhero movie and more an alien sci-fi flick. The Avengers had aliens, and ships, and invasions, but it wasn't the focus, it was part of the feel of a superhero story. The focus on aliens, the technology, Kryptonian animals, spaceships, it was all too much for my tastes. Not enough of Superman being an ideal, or his morality, he was just trying to stop the evil man killing people.

3. I hated how Jonathan Kent died. I don't buy that scene at all. First of all, Clark could have saved the dog without using powers, so Jonathan should have never gone back out there. Secondly, I've got enough faith in humanity to think that somebody else in that crowd besides Clark would have tried to go out and help him. Thirdly, Jonathan wasn't given enough development for me to buy that he would rather die right in front of Clark and Martha instead of Clark saving him because it might potentially set some people wondering. Finally, I don't believe that Clark would have let him die. I don't care if he thought Jonathan wanted it that way, he would not have just let his father die when he could have saved him. I much prefer the death method of the heart attack, something not even Clark can stop.

OK, now on to positives.

It was visually stunning. Which should be a given since Zack Snyder directed it.

I like the idea that the Fortress of Solitude is a ship. It makes more sense than an ice crystal castle that nobody notices but Lex Luthor can find easily. Good decision there.

Faora was fun to watch. So quick and merciless, that was a nice effect to see rather than just brute strength.

The story was very well done in explaining how he finally finds out about his history, and how Zod et. al manage to show up right at that time. I was angry at first at the convenience of that, but then they actually explained it in a believable way with the distress call activation. And explaining how the Zod Squad escaped the Phantom Zone.

I liked that he killed Zod. Now, I don't want Superman to lose his morality, and become a killing machine. But I hate when superheros are like "dude no way I totally can't kill him I don't do that" and everybody else is like "but dude this guy is totally evil and he definitely needs to die" and he's like "but I CAN'T!" I think the writers did a good job of finding a way to make it necessary, so he had to do it, but it was unavoidable, and he hated doing it, and was horrified by it.

References. Now, I'm not a DC fan, and I've never read a Superman comic, but I know a lot of the cinematic and television history. I loved seeing the LexCorp sign on the trucks, and though I missed it, I read that "Wayne Enterprises" appeared on the satellite that was destroyed near the end of the film. And having Lana Lang and Pete Ross, even in small roles, was nice to catch.

I also enjoyed the Christian themes in the film. These range from the obvious (meeting with the pastor) to the subtle (Superman being 33 when Zod arrived), and the general (Superman being sent from the "heavens" by his father to save mankind).

Overall I liked the film. Jonathan's death was really the only thing that I completely disliked. Everything else I can live with.

I really think that a sequel, picking up after mankind has accepted that there are aliens and its no longer the main focus of the story, could be mind blowing.

7.5 out of 10

In recent film context: Avengers > Amazing Spider-Man and Man of Steel > Iron Man 3 and Dark Knight Rises


100 Words or Less: *minor spoilers* Man of Steel (2013)

This movie had the potential to be amazing. It was very well done, but a few things kept it from being as great as I thought it could be.

I disagree with Snyder’s focus on aliens/first contact, instead of the superhero feel Superman has become an icon of.

Characters are only skin deep.  Especially disappointed with Amy Adams (Lois).

I hated how they killed Jonathan.

In general, it felt too much like a remake of Superman II than a new installment to reboot the franchise.

Hopefully the sequel can pick up with the positives and skyrocket from there. Such potential.


Friday, June 14, 2013

100 Words or Less: Superman (1948)

This was a well-made serial.

Kirk Alyn (uncredited) did great job at portraying two different characters. Noel Neill is now my favorite Lois.  She captures the essence without being annoying. I loved her hat.

Phrases like “This looks like a job for Superman” and “Up, up, and awaaaaay!” were overused. Superman’s powers were animated, which looked silly, but for the 1940s, I’d rather have a well-done animated sequence over ridiculous live-action. They were edited quite well, although some segments were overused.


These flaws would have been reduced by seeing one chapter a week, but I watched it in one sitting.




Wednesday, June 12, 2013

100 Words or Less: Batman and Robin (1949 serial)

I’m not sure how many film serials had sequels, but this was one of those sequels. Somehow, even though everything was marginally better than the original (acting, costumes, music), this one was still worse. Probably because the plot was so much more boring. New cast, so no Alfred to save the day. And though the acting in the original wasn’t great, I could at least buy that everybody looked the part. In this take, Robin looked older than Batman.

This one also took me two sittings to finish.


There was one thing that stayed the same for the sequel: Fedoras


100 Words or Less: Batman (1943 serial)

Very old. Very Racist. Bad costumes. Horrible fight choreography. Despite the age, and the medium (serial as opposed to film), it’s hard to take seriously. It’s hard for most modern viewers to appreciate a serial. Watching it in one sitting (or two), was hard. Constant cliffhangers, redundancies everywhere.


It introduced the Batcave to the mythology, and it earned a sequel. Really, though, the only positive thing was William Austin as Alfred. 70 years ago, this may have been exciting. But the dialogue is awful. And the actor playing the lead will forever have me refer to this as “Fatman.”

Fedoras.


Saturday, April 20, 2013

Coulson Lives, and so does this blog

Sorry for the lack of posts lately, but I've just been swamped with a ton of stuff lately. School, work, and personal life have all been clashing, and sleep has been scarce. Not quite out of the woods yet, but I've got enough time to blog a bit, so here we go.

Updates everywhere! Beware, lots of links

IRON MAN 3: (May 3, 2013)
So many updates, but unless you're under a rock, you should have seen most of it.
12 days, 2 hours, 17 minutes, 40 seconds



MAN OF STEEL: (June 14, 2013)
Probably some new info I should be aware of, but Iron Man 3 and Marvel/MCU has my focus right now.




WOLVERINE: (July 26, 2013)
New photos released http://www.superherohype.com/news/articles/176309-high-quality-photos-from-the-wolverine-released




AGENTS OF SHIELD: (Fall 2013)
Clark Gregg talks about Coulsons return. Not much info, but it's fun because it's Clark Gregg.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rmuz4JaoPI



THOR: THE DARK WORLD: (November 8, 2013)
First teaser poster released




CAPTAIN AMERICA: THE WINTER SOLDIER (April 4, 2014)
http://www.superherohype.com/news/articles/176311-will-a-peggy-carter-short-film-premiere-at-comic-con


And here's this terribly-low-quality photo of the new suit being used in the new film, based on the "Commander Rogers" suit from the comics.


AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 2: (May 2, 2014)
New photos released, including Jamie Foxx as Electro (which looks like utter crap) and Emma Stone as Gwen Stacy (who looks significantly better than crap) http://www.superherohype.com/gallery/spider-man/the-amazing-spider-man-2/the-amazing-spider-man-2-set-photos


GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY: (August 1, 2014)
Some interesting reading here. http://www.superherohype.com/news/articles/176307-james-gunn-talks-guardians-of-the-galaxy

Michael Rooker has been cast as Yondu, an alien Mystic. Until this point, it appeared the film would be taking material only from the 2008 team, but this character is from the original incarnation.




ANT-MAN: (November 6, 2015)
Recently Edgar Wright released a tweet saying that besides his own film, he has directed one scene in one other film coming out this summer, asking his followers to guess which. The prevailing theory is that he filmed a post-credits scene for Iron Man 3, so we may see Ant-Man make his debut pretty soon.

"edgarwright ‏@edgarwright
8 Apr
Aside from 'The World's End', I directed one shot in another summer movie. But which? #IProbablyWillNotTell"

HEROES: (TBA)
OK, so if you never watched "Heroes," it was this amazing show about super-powered individuals living in the real world. I recommend it (I think it's on Netflix), but be warned, the mythology is very complex and intricate, so it's a lot to keep track of. But I love it. I own the whole series, because I was stupid and didn't start watching until it cancelled after four season. But now, it may be coming back!
http://www.superherohype.com/news/articles/176269-nbcs-heroes-could-come-back

Sunday, February 3, 2013

My Epic Plan to Save DC Movies

I have to start out with a disclaimer. I formulated this idea months ago, before I knew anything about the upcoming SHIELD TV show or anything that would be involved with it (save Coulson), so don't think that I learned something about that somewhere and just said something similar but about DC. This is my own idea! Whether you like the idea or not, it's mine!

Now for an introduction. The basis of my plan has to do not with characters. Not with actors. Not with writers, producers, directors, or Hans Zimmer. It has to do with an under-rated and overlooked medium. Or, to be more specific, a genre within the medium. So now, to build anticipation, I'm going to talk to a little bit about mediums.

I'm not talking about comic books, or any literature-based medium. So the big two here would be movies and TV. It all started with serials. Marvel and DC both had movie serials back in the day. Then, full-length movies used became the big thing. Sure, nobody now thinks much of Howard the Duck, or the original Punisher film, but movies became a big deal. But it got to be that a movie wasn't enough. You had to start a film franchise. DC made that big with superheroes back in the 70s and 80s with Superman and Batman. But that was kind of all they could do with it. Then Marvel took the reigns and brought us franchises of Blade, X-Men, Spider-Man, Fantastic Four (OK...maybe not a full franchise). But Marvel was going places, and DC was stuck. They started spinning off their own franchises over the years (Supergirl, Steel, and Catwoman) without success. Marvel had their fair share of spin-off failures too (Elektra). But Marvel was taking over. So DC revisited their old success stories, with Batman Begins and Superman Returns.

Obviously we know how that panned out, Superman didn't impress and has another reboot coming out this summer, and Batman changed the way people perceive superhero films, and gave us arguably the best movie villain of all time in The Dark Knight, even if that trilogy ended disappointingly (IMO).

Then came the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Marvel started making successful films based on lesser-known characters like Iron Man, Hulk, and Thor, that linked together with each other. DC took notice. They attempted to give the world Green Lantern, but it didn't work.

But what about it didn't work? Did it make a lot of money? Yes. Was it considered a success? No. Why? Because they SPENT too much money on it. Was it well-liked? No. Keep this in mind, I'm going to come back to this later.

Marvel, on the other hand, kept it coming. And then came the Avengers. After Green Lantern, DC said it would not go the route of Marvel and make a shared universe between their movies (due in some part to Chris Nolan and their dependence on him), but after the huge success of The Avengers, all bets were off. Suddenly DC announced they would release a Justice League film in 2015, the same year that Avengers 2 comes out. How do they hope to make this a success? Are they going to make a bunch of solo movies to lead up to JL like Marvel did? Flash? Green Lantern reboot? Wonder Woman? Will Christian Bale be in this universe? No, no, no, no, no. Well, what are they doing again? Creating a JL movie out of nothing, with no character introductions, and hoping to compete with Avengers 2 which will have been building for 7 years by that point? Are they serious?

So then I started asking why? Why isn't DC making solo movies to build up the necessary amount before unleashing a whole JL movie? And then it hit me: the movies would be no good. How great could a Flash movie possibly be? Or a Hawkman movie? Plastic Man? I don't think so. Green Lantern scared DC, and now they're afraid to go out on a limb. Unlike Marvel, who's now working on Guardians of the Galaxy, Ant-Man, and Dr. Strange just because they know they can.

We're going to pause now, and pick up later. But first, the other major medium.

TV.

DC had some good success with Smallville over the last 11 or 12 years, but the show ended after its 10th season. True, it had its weak points, but they were able to bring along supporting characters like Supergirl, Green Arrow, Flash, Cyborg, Aquaman, Dr. Fate, Hawkman, Black Canary, and Zatanna. Not to mention villains like Brainiac, Doomsday, Darkseid, and of course Lex Luthor. It teased Lois Lane for years and gradually brought the Daily Planet and Jimmy Olsen to life. It worked well because it had time to develop, get reaction, and evolve. Green Arrow's role got expanded because the audiences loved it. He now has his own show (which it bothers me that it's a reboot, different story, different actor, different everything, but that's another topic).

So what's the problem with TV shows? They're long. They're hard to pick up if you're behind. And they don't bring the big bucks like movies. But the positives? It's cheaper. It's faster to get ideas across, and you can evolve based on audience reaction.

Which brings me to my magic medium....

The anthology TV show.

Creating solo movies for each character DC decides to use in their JL movie would take too long, they'd be too far behind Marvel, and it would take a ton of money. But by using an anthology TV series, DC could use 1-3 episodes developing a character, gaining reactions of it, what works, what doesn't, take notes, and move on to another character for the next few episodes. This would allow DC to introduce about 10 characters in a single year, and know what characters would get the strongest following in a movie series. That way there would be no surprise when people don't like Green Lantern or Superman Returns, after spending years and millions putting them together. They would spend less time and money, and be able to tell if a character would pay off or not. They could even bring old characters back teamed up with newer ones, to see how they'd work together. That's the beauty of the anthology format: you can spend more or less time on stories as you need. If they want to test out a smaller character, they could just devote 1 episode (45 minutes) to them. Or, if they wanted to really introduce and elaborate on a bigger name, say Wonder Woman, they could use three episodes (2 hours and 15 minutes) to explain her origin, and her powers, and get her out to audiences as a modern heroine. Then they could take the best received characters, and pair them up here and there throughout the show. Then, after a year or two of a show, they could go big with a movie, and it wouldn't be such a huge gamble. Even if they can't get the show going ASAP, let's say they start in 2014. They could still get a huge following and a movie put out just one year after Avengers 2, right as Marvel starts going out on farther limbs with their Phase 3 introducing newer characters. Keep in mind too that Fantastic Four will be rebooting then too, and X-Men will be combining their franchises. So DC needs more than a lot of wishful thinking if they're going to continue to make an impact in the movie market.

I love marvel. I love the MCU. So I'm not saying by any means I'm upset by what they've done. But even though I'm not nearly as much of a fan as DC, there needs to be appropriate competition in order for bigger and badder ideas to happen, and if DC fails, what will Marvel have to keep it from becoming just a cash cow? Their success right now is that they appeal to fans, they're doing it right. But if they have no competition, who knows how long that will last.

DC needs to tread carefully. But they can stay in this. They can come back. And hopefully they can get some decent movies out there about characters other than the Dark Knight and the Boy Scout.

Man of Steel comes out this summer, and it's said to spearhead their DCCU. If its part of their JL plan, that will help, but it won't be enough.

Now, after all that, here's some photos of female Justice League cosplayers! Get motivated, DC!


Batman has become a huge success at the box office, but the "Bat Family" hasn't


been seen since the 90s. Maybe a Batgirl revival is due to help kick-start the


DCCU?





Robin is one of those members of Batman's extended family that has been all but

ignored since "Batman & Robin" in the 90s. While he was hinted at (in a poorly

executed way, if you ask me) in TDKR, it's really not Robin. Maybe the DCCU

could use a bigger Bat-Family. There have been multiple Robin's in the comics, both

male and female. Or, to go a different route, maybe, to connect the Dark Knight

trilogy to the DCCU, Batman's "death" could have helped spark others into action,

giving rise to the Justice League.




Green Lantern didn't do as well at the box office as DC hoped, but there are still

possibilities there. Expand upon that universe, introduce more Green Lanterns, and

use that to introduce threats that the Justice League needs to step in to take care of.

Come on, DC, don't give in to the yellow power of fear.



Superman Returns changed way too much to be a good adaptation, but it wasn't a

terrible movie. The Supergirl spin-off from the 80s was. She was brought in as a

supporting character on Smallville and was made sexy, strong, and independent.

This character can work on the big screen, and should be a part of JL if it's going to

happen. If you're struggling with making Superman vulnerable, as sexist as this

sounds, putting the female version in there will help with that, because people are

more empathetic to females.



How has Wonder Woman not gotten her own movie yet? DC had a chance to get

this out there and let it go? Why? She's the icon of female superheroes, she's got

very unique aspects to her powers and her characters, and even if people don't

know much about her, they know the name. Get this character on the big screen,

and prove female superheroes can hold their own against the men.




Black Canary was brought in on Smallville, but wasn't developed a whole lot. Still,

that exposure is something, and as an actual female character from the comics, and

not just a female version of an originally male character, she, like Wonder Woman,

could be used to counter the idea that women can't make great superheroes.




Aquaman had an unreleased pilot on the CW that never made it to air because of

the WB merging with the UPN and cutting programs. It was available on iTunes,

however, and I enjoyed it. Later, Aquaman was brought on as a supporting

character for Smallville. I realize he's made fun of more than any other superhero,

but throw in Aquagirl and he'll have the bragging rights. Simply writing an ocean-

based threat would give him/her plenty to keep busy with, and could really

highlight the potential.


Green Arrow became a major supporting character on Smallville and has gone

on to get his own show, so he's got a following. He actually briefly had a female

archer sidekick on his own show, but that's not the point. The point is, archery

has a lot of interest nowadays -- Lord of the Rings, Immortals, the Avengers, the

Hunger Games, Brave, and Robin Hood -- there's interest there, and there's a

following for Green Arrow.





Another well-known hero with no big screen exposure. Flash (or,

technically, "Impulse") was used as a supporting character on Smallville,

and DC could beat Marvel to the punch, putting Flash out on screen

before Marvel uses Quicksilver. It's a simple power, but has effective

uses, and there's really no reason not to throw him on board.




Hawkman was brought onto Smallville briefly, and personally, I loved him. In the

show, however, his wife was already dead. Bring him and Hawkgirl in to expand

the mythology of the universe, and have some great warriors on your team.







OK, I'll admit it, Martian Manhunter doesn't look great as a female. But what we

got on Smallville wasn't any closer to the comic appearance. He never reached his

potential on the show, but he could be really interesting if used correctly. I doubt he

has a huge fan base, but get him known, especially with Marvel going cosmic in their

next Phases.



OK, I know she's not on the Justice League, or even a hero, but I can't express

how much I would love for Harley Quinn to be involved in a DC film. With the

Joker MIA and never going to be seen again (at least anytime soon) due to Heath-

sensitivities, she's the perfect way to continue that villainy and terror without having

to side-step the joker, or try and put him into a different character like the Riddler.

Use some creative flashbacks and narration to explain her backstory, and her

motives for wanting to take down Batman. Then pair her up with some heavy hitting villains (not lame

henchmen like Bane) and give the JL a reason to get together.